Reuben Saltzman

Negotiations after the inspection, part 1: options for the buyer

I wrote a blog post back in January of 2009 titled “Does the seller need to fix this?” The purpose of that blog post was to discuss the different options that buyers have after getting some not-so-great news during a home inspection. I really should have titled it “Negotiations after the inspection”, because that’s what it was all about. At the time I wrote that, a lot of home sellers were either underwater or had no equity left in their home, but that was almost seven years ago, and all of that has changed. It’s time for an update on this topic.

Report is not a clubBefore a home buyer even has a home inspection, it’s important to know what the home inspection is all about. A home buyer hires a home inspector to learn about the home, and the inspection report is the document that the buyer is left with, detailing the results of the inspection. The inspection report is not a repair list for the seller, nor is it a stick to beat the seller with on price. Most home inspection reports will have a large list of recommendations, typically for improvements, repairs, and safety upgrades. This is normal for a used house.

Some people say that home inspectors come up with a long list of deficiencies in order to justify their fees. That’s simply not true, not to mention offensive.

Issues that come up during a home inspection may be negotiable, but there are no hard and fast rules about repairs that sellers need to complete as a result of a home inspection. In fact, here in Minnesota where home inspections are not regulated, there are no rules at all.  When a home inspector finds defects during a home inspection, there are four choices for a buyer:

  1. Renegotiate the price.
  2. Cancel the purchase agreement.
  3. Ask the seller to perform repairs
  4. Do nothing.

Renegotiate the price. With this option, the buyer can hire their own professionals to do the work, and they can oversee the whole project after they own the house. This is a common approach, but it’s not always a practical approach because it doesn’t leave the new home buyers with any cash to pay for repairs.

Cancel the purchase agreement. This typically happens when the buyer decides there are too many issues with the house, or the issues are greater than what the buyer wants to deal with or when buyers  and sellers can’t come to an agreement.

Ask the seller to perform repairs. I’m not a fan of this option. If a seller has performed work at their home and it was done wrong, why would they get it right the second time? When a buyer asks a seller to repair things, they are basically making the seller the general contractor for their new home. The seller has no motivation to hire high quality work. In fact, they have a financial incentive to hire the cheapest person in town. I know from experience that the work will often be performed incorrectly, or the work will be sub-par and the materials will be the cheapest possible. Maybe both.

It’s a frustrating situation for buyers when I go out to verify repairs the day before closing and none of the repairs are right. What happens now?  If the seller is going to be responsible for repairs, language should be included in the purchase agreement that requires licensed contractors to do the work, permits pulled and inspected by the authority having jurisdiction (the city), and proof of both given to the buyer well in advance of the closing date. Just about anything related to plumbing, electrical, or HVAC requires a permit, and a lot of work performed by carpenters requires a permit. If a project is too small to require a permit, should it really be included in the negotiations?

Do nothing. This is often the best option for buyers. When buying a used home, buyers shouldn’t expect everything to be perfect, because it never is. Walls get damaged, showers leak, appliances fail without notice. This doesn’t mean buyers shouldn’t address defects after they’ve bought the house, but it’s unrealistic to expect sellers of used houses to fix every little defect. Asking sellers to address a long list of minor repairs will make the seller feel defensive about their home and make the buyers look petty.

In the next two posts, I’ll be discussing common ‘negotiations items’ that come up after the inspection, and I’ll be giving my two cents on them.

Reuben Saltzman, Structure Tech Home Inspections – Email – Minnesota Home Inspector


2 responses to “Negotiations after the inspection, part 1: options for the buyer”

  1. Negotiations after the inspection, part 3: reasonable negotiation items | Structure Tech Home Inspections
    December 22, 2015, 5:23 am

    […] home inspection, I discussed the options that a home buyer has after getting a home inspection in part 1, and gave a list of what I consider to be unreasonable negotiation items in part 2.  For this […]

  2. Negotiations after the inspection, part 2: stuff that shouldn't be negotiated | Structure Tech Home Inspections
    December 22, 2015, 5:30 am

    […] last week’s blog post, Negotiations after the inspection, part 1: options for the buyer, I discussed four options that a home buyer has after receiving a written inspection […]

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Comments on posts over 90 days old are disabled, as of 1/7/14.